HAPPINESS AND MORALITY Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

HAPPINESS AND MORALITY - marches Paper ExampleBased on the points raised by virtue ethics, a individual is cosmos deterrent example when he is performing moral acts. Therefore, the requisite for cultivating a reputation as being good is through performing acts that are moral or utter(a) which take ups the soul becomes moral or virtuous. This is the heart of her argument regarding the supposed autonomy of felicity and godliness with each other. Aristotle postulates being moral will make you happy (qtd. in Vitrano 4), which Vitrano argues saying that the morality and intellectual character of a soulfulness do non automatically lead to happiness (3). In her words, Vitrano states we do find happy immoralists, people who knowingly breakout the rules of society and appear unaffected by it (3). Vitrano makes a plausible explanation for her conclusion that a person who appears to be moral needs first to perform virtuous acts or by being virtuous. peerless can non establish hi s or her image as a virtuous person without doing acts that have intrinsic moral values in it. I agree with Vitrano that an appearance of a virtuous individual entails the actual doing of things which are deemed virtuous. For instance, a president is not seen as a virtuous person without acting like one, such(prenominal) as abolishing the death penalty because it is pro-life. If the president does the opposite by signing the retention of that capital punishment, on a philosophical perspective, he appears to be immoral by doing the exact opposite of a virtuous act. Based on Aristotelian perspective, moral or intellectual virtues are the key to happiness meaning, tribulation to appear virtuous by not performing moral acts does not make a person happy. However, I do agree with Vitrano that moral acts do not necessarily result to happiness because it is an unconditional domain apart from morality and intelligence. This has also the same logic with what Martin says, Individuals blessed with all(prenominal) good circumstance can be unhappy because they are depressed, and individuals with little good fortune can still be happy (8). In the same way that fortune does not mean happiness, doing moral acts also does not automatically lead to happiness. Pascals Wager Similarities and Differences with Vitranos Christine Vitranos view of happiness and morality shares some similarities with Pascals Wager. Both Vitrano and Pascal acknowledged the subjectivity among humans in impairment of reasoning their state of happiness and their religion. Vitrano states that happiness cannot be construed on the volume of material possessions a person has or the moral and intellectual cause of his or her actions (3). Happiness is when humans view their lives positively, albeit fortune or doing things with morality and intellectual purpose as foundations (Vitrano 3). In other words, human happiness depends on the individualized outlook of the person regarding the way he or she lives li fe. This view is embodied in the life merriment view that follows the subjectivity of ones basis for being in a state of happiness (Vitrano 3). On one hand, Blaise Pascal in his work Pensees, encapsulated in his Wager the rationalization behind every religion. In the same case as Mathematics believes the existence of an infinite number although its appearance has not yet been witnessed, the same case applies to the existence of God. In Pascals Wager, he quantifies that God is continuously incomprehensible because he is not, by affinity, related to us, and that he has neither