War and the Integration of Ethical Principles under the Golden Rule Essay Example for Free

War and the Integration of Ethical teachings under the fortunate regulating EssayIn todays moral climate, where the sanctity of life is unappreciated, it is fair to say that the adoption of a large ethical approach to human interaction should be based on the favourable rule teaching adopted by Thiroux. Many wars have been fought throughout the history of time, and the victorious of human life is about universally a part of such conflicts. The Golden Rule appears to be a catch-all dominion that has the function to reduce the total amount of harm d one and completely(a) to humanity for almost any reason that such harmful actions efficacy be aimed. The Golden Rule seems inherently utilitarian, as it accords benefits (or the utilitarian good) to those whose rights ar keep backd, as well as to those whose sense of morality is satisfied in having acted concord to this rule (by observe these rights). In fact, it is arguable that all other rules and principles that ato mic number 18 cited by Thiroux hinge upon this particular rule, which (if observed) seems to be one that has the ability to improve the quality of life of all humans on the earth.Perhaps the most pitch-black of all human conflict ends in war, and such conflicts be usually based on rivalries that impact land, retri stillion, or perceived threats to national security. These problems stem from such vices as greed or hubris, which are in direct conflict with the principles taught by the golden rule. In living ones life according to a rule that prevents one from performing actions that are likely to make another feel uncomfortable, some(prenominal) of these vices give the gate be avoided.Greed, for example, involves the perpetual desire for and gathering of a particular commodity regardless of the resulting approachability and accessibility to others. A person who abides by the golden rule would consider tempering such desires at one time it appears that such a desire might imping e upon the resources availability to others. Not only is this kind, but it is also fair. The principle of justice offers a similar view, which seeks to give to all persons what they are due.If individuals consider themselves as being worthy of such rights as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, then those who live by the golden rule also consider this right to belong to others. Fairness and justice would therefore grant these persons are right to their fair share of the resources available here on the earth. The justice inherent in the Golden Rule therefore demonstrates how it acts as parent to the principle of justice. This Golden Rule can be employ to the greed that is evinced when wars break out because of one countrys desire for more land space.This has been bare in many historical events. Thousands of years ago, the Trojan War demonstrated the Greeks desire to take everyplace the ground control direct by Troy Assyrians raided Middle Eastern tribes and countries in o rder to gain more territory the European settlers drove Native Americans from their lands in order to expand their own claims. The wars that resulted from these conflicts led to the death of many, and the displacement of many more.However, the application of the Golden Rule would have led to the raiders placing themselves in the tog of their victims, and they would have come to understand the unpleasant nature of the victims suffering. The wars and deaths could on that ground have been avoided. Here it becomes apparent that the Golden Rule also contains the essence of the Principle of Goodness. This rule states that the promotion of goodness goes hand in hand with refraining from doing harm to others.When one places oneself in the shoes of others (according to the Golden Rule) it becomes abundantly clear whenever actions tend to do harm to others because of the discomfort one feels when considering the same action being performed upon oneself. When the reasons for which wars are f ought are scrutinized, it is evident that the Principle of Goodness is being ignored, and this happens because people refrain from placing themselves in the shoes of others. The Golden Rules constituent(a) principle of justice would help alleviate the problem of war.The Value of Life principle advocated by Thiroux can also be seen as an inherent concept existing within the Golden rule, and the application of this principle to war would also help alleviate this burden. The self-centeredness often perceived in humans might be considered a natural trait, when one reflects that the life of every individual revolves inevitably around him-/herself. battalion consider their lives very important and worth doing almost anything to save. In other words, people generally apprise their own lives.If the Golden Rule is observed, then not only would people value their own lives, but they would also value the lives of others. This Value of Life principle, shown now to be inherent in the Gold Rul e is in complete opposition to the numerous wars that have been (and continue to be) fought on this planet. When people begin to observe the right of others to have life, they are in effect granting to those others a right that they deem across-the-board to themselves. such a right disallows fighting, malice, and killing for any reason. The Golden Rule also demonstrates its opposition to war in its observation of the Principle of Individual Freedom.In the most literal sense, it opposes the regular practice of war that involves taking prisoners or even enslaving others. Capturing persons against their will directly impinges upon their freedom, as it restricts their movement and their performance of everyday actions such as bathing, eating, sleeping and conversing. If a person inclined to wage war operates by the Golden Rule, he or she will be inclined to refrain from capture, as he/she would not like to be captured in return. In addition to this literal aspect, war also impinges up on individual freedoms to live in the way they pick. breathing in a war zone restricts both movement and thought. Such persons are constantly dysphoric about whether or not they might be caught in the violence that surrounds them. This constant war oblige upon them forces them to constantly think of troubling things rather than on the pleasant or interesting thoughts that they would most prefer to have in mind, such as family, friends, aesthetics or love. These restrictions imposed by war run afoul upon Individual Freedom, and are created by persons who do not consider these privileges (granted to them) as rights that should also be extended to other.Of course, war is a complex matter, and it is often the case that the persons who end up performing many of the violative acts are those who are fighting against a previous (or current) threat/invasion. In this case, however, it can still be seen that the initial conflict is caused by those who neglect the principles of the Golden Rule. While at times people are actually forced into murderous or warlike actions that appear to conflict the Golden Rule, careful abstract will usually demonstrate that some disregard of the well-being of others lies at the root of these age-old conflicts.